Tuesday 13 October 2009

UN rights chief speaks out on Iranian juvenile exections

The UN High Commisioner on Human Rights, Navi Pillay, criticised Iran, yesterday, for their execution of juveniles.

Her comments come after Behnoud Shojaie, a 17 year old Iranian, was executed on Sunday after being found guilty of murder. Expressing her dismay, Pillay said that Iran must "end execution of juvenile offenders once and for all."

Both the High Commissioner and UN Special Rapportuers had raised Behnoud Shojaie's case with Iranian authorities, reminding them of their international obligations not to execute minors. Iran is signed up to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and to the Convention on the Rights of the Child, both of which prohibit the death penalty for convicted youth offenders.

Pillay stressed that "Under international law, the death penalty can only be applied when very strict conditions are met, for example only in respect of the most serious crimes and only after scrupulously fair trials," She added that the UN human rights body believes the imposition of a death penalty where the crime did not result in loss of life goes against the ICCPR.

The High Commisioner also said she had "major concerns about the way the recent trials of opposition activists were conducted, and I hope these judgments will be reviewed carefully by the higher courts,"

Joe Stork of New York-bases rights Watchdog, Human Rights Watch, said that "The Iranian Judiciary's enthusiasm to execute juvenile offenders despite its international obligations and objections in Iran itself to such brutal acts is shocking...This is a callous affront to basic human dignity."

According to 2008 figures from Amnesty International, Iran has executed at least 37 juvenile offenders since 1990. Amnesty says that Iran was the only country to execute a juvenile in 2008 and carried out at least six executions.

Bookmark and Share

Abbas 'dissapointed' with Obama administration

A leaked memo from Palestinian president Mahmoud Abbas accuses the Obama administration of buckling under Israeli pressure and said that any hope had "evaporated".

The document, which reflects a wider frustration with the White House's lack of action on Middle East peace, says that "All hopes placed in the new US administration and President Obama have evaporated,".

The memo continued to say that Obama "couldn't withstand the pressure of the Zionist lobby, which led to a retreat from his previous positions on halting settlement construction and defining an agenda for the negotiations and peace".

Palestinians have remained resolute that talks cannot begin until the construction of Israeli settlements ceases. They are also pushing for the pre-1967 war borders to be respected by Israel before they are willing to negotiate.

Yasser Abed Rabbo, a senior aide to Abbas said "The Israelis need to acknowledge that the 1967 borders are the borders between the two states, and this is the foundation of any negotiations,".

Despite a meeting between Obama, Abbas and Netanyahu and the US president's Nobel Peace Prize there have been difficulties in starting negotiations. Notably, the White House has changed the language used on the Israeli settlements, no longer calling for an immediate cessation but for a toned down "restraint".

Tensions remain heightened between Israel and Palestine after the Gaza War early in the year and the subsequent calls for international prosecutions of both sides for war crimes.

Bookmark and Share

Iranian blogger challenges Obama

An Iranian blogger has asked US President Barack Obama how he would have reacted to electoral fraud in the US election.

The blogger, 'harfehesaaby'(meaning logical words), asked the president how he would have felt if, despite the movement for change in America and against the will of the people, McCain had been declared winner of last year's ballot. Harfehesaaby asks if people in America had been "killed, jailed, and raped...how would you have expected the world to react?"

President Obama,

First allow me to congratulate you on winning the Nobel Peace prize. I hope that your future record will also make you and the Norwegian decision-makers proud.

Let me say a few words about the vote that brought you to power. I'm sure you remember the enthusiasm with which Americans voted for you and the excitement that your slogan of "change" created among voters who were upset with the policies of former President Bush. You know very well that the majority of the people in the world shared the feelings of the American people and pushed for your election even though they couldn't vote for you.

If you were to multiply all the excitement and enthusiasm that your election generated, you'd have a picture of what happened during the Iranian presidential vote. And if you multiplied Americans' dissatisfaction with Bush, you'd understand the degree of Iranians' dissatisfaction with Mahmud Ahmadinejad and his allies. The repressed people of Iran were determined to put an end to superstition, warmongering, and fecklessness by casting their ballots and trying to change it through a democratic vote. The 85 percent turnout is good evidence of the degree to which Iranians thirst for change.

But President Obama, a coup took place in Iran, the votes of the people were stolen, and a fake president was introduced to the world. The lie was so big that Iran's streets became the scene of demonstrations by millions of Iranians who wanted their stolen vote back.

But the coup leaders shot at the people following orders by Iran's supreme leader. Many were arrested, some were forced into making false confessions, a number of detainees were raped and tortured. Still, people stood firm to get back their votes and to call for justice.

Now I have one question for you, Mr. President: If the fraud and the above-mentioned events had happened in your country -- if they had announced John Mc Cain as the winner of the presidential vote, if they had have killed, jailed, and raped people -- how would you have expected the world to react?

With regards and respect,

An Iranian blogger




The bloggger's comments come four months after violence erupted following Iran's presidential election, which saw inucumbent Mahmoud Ahmadinejad reelected. In the days and weeks following the vote large numbers of supporters of reform candidate, Mir Hossian Mousavi, turned out on the streets to protest against alleged voting rigging and to contest the official results.


Harfehesaaby's blog including the message to Obama in Persian/Farsi can be found at harfehesaaby.blogspot.com
Bookmark and Share

Friday 2 October 2009

Rio wins 2016 olympic bid


After two rounds of voting IOC President declared Rio De Janerio winners of the 2016 olympic bid.

Rio won the vote fending off competition from Chicago and Tokya before going head to head with Madrid's 2016 bid in the final. Before today's vote Chicago and Rio were seen as the favourites, however, in a shock first round result Chicago was eliminated.

Despite a visit and speech to the IOC in Copenhagen by Barack and Michelle Obama, Chicago did not manage to secure enough support in the first round. Speculation has been made on the affect this could have on his domestic approval ratings. Crowds who had gathered in central Chicago were left open mouthed after Jacques Rogge announced the result.

Following the result Rio De Janerio's mayor, Sergio Cabral, said the decision was "unbelievable, overwhelming and spectacular," On Copacabana Beach celebrations are already well underway and the party is expected to continue long into the night.

In Madrid, crowds streamed from the square where many had gathered to here the result after Rio's win was announced. Speaking on Spanish television Queen Sofia said "We must congratulate Rio, and also the work that we Spaniards have done, it was excellent. It's a disappointment for us,".




Bookmark and Share